dblock / ruby-enum

100%

master: 100%

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH document-performance

branch: document-performance

CHANGE BRANCH

x

Reset

• document-performance
• HEAD
• dblock/coveralls-github-token
• fix-subclass-no-defines
• fix-values-override-issue-62
• master
• memoize-enum-hash
• rename-ruby-namespace
• replace-code-climate-with-coveralls
• ruby-4.0
• subclass-inherited-values
• update-copyright-year

Build # #34

Build Type

Pull #61

Committed by dblock

Commit Message

Document Ruby::Enum performance overhead in README

Add benchmarks/basic.rb comparing basic Ruby::Enum operations
(constant access, value, key, key?, keys, values) against their
plain Ruby equivalents (constants, Hash), and a rake benchmark:basic
task to run it.

Add a new 'Performance' subsection under Benchmarks in README.md
documenting, with real numbers, that constant access has no
measurable overhead while hash-backed lookups carry roughly 3-5x
overhead vs. a plain Hash, that this overhead does not grow with
subclass depth (see rake benchmark:inheritance), and that
Ruby::Enum::Case is the one notable outlier at 50-100x slower than
a native case statement (see rake benchmark:case).

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Pull Request Pull Request #61: Document performance overhead in README

Coverage Stats

161 of 161 relevant lines covered (100.0%)

6.86 hits per line