#34
100%
master: 100%

Ran 15 Aug 2026 02:00AM UTC

Jobs 1

Files 8

Run time 1min

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 15 Aug 2026 02:00AM UTC coverage: 100.0%. Remained the same

Build # #34

Build Type

Pull #61

Committed by

dblock

Commit Message

Document Ruby::Enum performance overhead in README

Add benchmarks/basic.rb comparing basic Ruby::Enum operations
(constant access, value, key, key?, keys, values) against their
plain Ruby equivalents (constants, Hash), and a rake benchmark:basic
task to run it.

Add a new 'Performance' subsection under Benchmarks in README.md
documenting, with real numbers, that constant access has no
measurable overhead while hash-backed lookups carry roughly 3-5x
overhead vs. a plain Hash, that this overhead does not grow with
subclass depth (see rake benchmark:inheritance), and that
Ruby::Enum::Case is the one notable outlier at 50-100x slower than
a native case statement (see rake benchmark:case).

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Pull Request Pull Request #61: Document performance overhead in README

Coverage Stats

161 of 161 relevant lines covered (100.0%)

6.86 hits per line

Jobs

ID	Job ID	Ran	Files	Coverage
1	#34.1	15 Aug 2026 02:00AM UTC	8	100.0

dblock / ruby-enum / #34
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build #34

dblock / ruby-enum / #34 100% master: 100%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build #34

dblock / ruby-enum / #34
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x