1
86%
master: 86%

Ran 30 Jul 2018 04:54PM UTC

Files 1

Run time 0s

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 30 Jul 2018 04:51PM UTC coverage: 84.932%. Remained the same

Job # 28.1

Build Type

Pull #6

travis-ci

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

Use vm_read_overwrite instead of vm_read

Change to use vm_read_overwrite instead of vm_read (as suggested here:
https://github.com/luser/read-process-memory/pull/5#issuecomment-408825281 )

Not only is this code simpler, I ran some tests and it seems like this is
significantly faster (with this change my overall rate of sampling from
a target process more than doubled, and this isn't the only call happening
in that test).

Pull Request Pull Request #6: Use vm_read_overwrite instead of vm_read

Run Details

62 of 73 relevant lines covered (84.93%)

0.85 hits per line

luser / read-process-memory / 28 / 1
86%
master: 86%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 28.1

luser / read-process-memory / 28 / 1 86% master: 86%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 28.1

luser / read-process-memory / 28 / 1
86%
master: 86%

README BADGES
x