• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

JuliaLang / julia / #38007 / 1
77%
master: 77%

Build:
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 13 Feb 2025 08:32AM UTC
Files 210
Run time 664min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

13 Feb 2025 05:53AM UTC coverage: 22.716% (+2.4%) from 20.346%
#38007.1

push

local

web-flow
Only implicitly `using` Base, not Core (#57357)

Inspired by the question in
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/57311#issuecomment-2648144227, I
want to revisit the basic setup where every module `using`s both `Core`
and `Base`. In general, I think we mostly expect users to inferface with
`Base`, not `Core`, so this PR changes things to only have new modules
`using` Base (while re-exporting all `Core` names from `Base`). There
should be little user-visible impact from these changes. The only
situation I can think of where it makes a difference is if somebody were
to make their own Base/toplevel module that does not re-export Core.
However, we don't really support that situation in the first place, and
I actually think it's a feature that such toplevel modules can more
closely control the set of implicitly exposed names.

11084 of 48794 relevant lines covered (22.72%)

115450.5 hits per line

Source Files on job #38007.1
  • Tree
  • List 210
  • Changed 139
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 84
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Build 38007
  • 20162ea3 on github
  • Prev Job for on master (##38006.1)
  • Next Job for on master (##38008.1)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc