• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

StoneCypher / jssm / 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85
100%
master: 100%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: docs_26-07-04_fable-v6-to-v16
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC
Jobs 6
Files 94
Run time 1min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

06 Jul 2026 02:42AM UTC coverage: 100.0%. Remained the same
9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85

push

github

StoneCypher
test(dragon): §6 arrow-decoration dragon tier + fix a fake stoch test it found (WP-6)

New arrow_decorations.maximal.ts (dragon §6), asserting behaviour first confirmed
against the parser:
- duplicate rejection at N>=3 (stoch only tested N=2), both sides;
- duplicate rejection with IDENTICAL values (detection keys on kind, not value);
- whitespace-run invariance at every inter-decoration gap (AST-equal);
- block/line comment-interleaving invariance at those gaps (AST-equal);
- malformed decorations (e.g. `N%%`) are reported as parse errors, never a
  duplicate misfire and never silently parsed.

Writing it surfaced a real find: arrow_decorations.stoch.ts's `shuffle` used
`rng() % (i+1)` while gen_splitmix32 returns a float in [0,1), so the index was
fractional and out[j] was always undefined — every shuffle collapsed to
[out[0], undefined, ...]. The three order-invariance tests were therefore fake:
both sides degraded to the same single decoration and passed without testing
order invariance. Fixed to Math.floor(rng()*(i+1)) (real Fisher-Yates) and added
a deterministic "shuffle is a real permutation" regression. Order invariance now
genuinely holds under real 4-decoration permutations (stoch still green, 12).

dragons-egg.md: dragon tier marked live, find-handling convention documented,
§6 status updated, the shuffle find logged.

Verified: vitest-dragon green (16), vitest-stoch green (12), eslint clean.

2595 of 2595 branches covered (100.0%)

Branch coverage included in aggregate %.

4158 of 4158 relevant lines covered (100.0%)

47842.48 hits per line

Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.1 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
2 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.2 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
3 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.3 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
4 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.4 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
5 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.5 06 Jul 2026 02:44AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
6 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85.6 06 Jul 2026 02:45AM UTC 94
100.0
GitHub Action Run
Source Files on build 9c22e282e4ebf1fb033e94220fa3eaed0625ed85
  • Tree
  • List 94
  • Changed 0
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 0
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line Branch Hits Branch Misses
  • Back to Repo
  • 9c22e282 on github
  • Prev Build on test_26-07-05_dragon-revival (#ABB1AD83...)
  • Next Build on test_26-07-05_dragon-revival (#B46FCBEE...)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc