Unleash / unleash / 11914508707

87%

master: 91%

push

github

feat: add potentiallyStale filter (#8784)

This PR adds support for the `potentiallyStale` value in the feature
search API. The value is added as a third option for `state` (in
addition to `stale` and `active`). Potentially stale is a subset of
active flags, so stale flags are never considered potentially stale,
even if they have the flag set in the db.

Because potentially stale is a separate column in the db, this
complicates the query a bit. As such, I've created a specialized
handling function in the feature search store: if the query doesn't
include `potentiallyStale`, handle it as we did before (the mapping has
just been moved). If the query *does* contain potentially stale, though,
the handling is quite a bit more involved because we need to check
multiple different columns against each other.

In essence, it's based on this logic:

when you’re searching for potentially stale flags, you should only get flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You should not get stale flags.

This can cause some confusion, because in the db, we don’t clear the potentially stale status when we mark a flag as stale, so we can get flags that are both stale and potentially stale.

However, as a user, if you’re looking for potentially stale flags, I’d be surprised to also get (only some) stale flags, because if a flag is stale, it’s definitely stale, not potentially stale.

This leads us to these six different outcomes we need to handle when your search includes potentially stale and stale or active:

1. You filter for “potentially stale” flags only. The API will give you only flags that are active and marked as potentially stale. You will not get stale flags.
2. You filter only for flags that are not potentially stale. You will get all flags that are active and not potentially stale and all stale flags.
3. You search for “is any of stale, potentially stale”. This is our “unhealthy flags” metric. You get all stale flags and all... (continued)

2782 of 3621 branches covered (76.83%)

43 of 43 new or added lines in 2 files covered. (100.0%)

14346 of 16361 relevant lines covered (87.68%)

712.29 hits per line