• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

psf / black / 870 / 4
96%
master: 96%

Build:
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 16 May 2020 08:24PM UTC
Files 5
Run time 0s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

16 May 2020 08:22PM UTC coverage: 96.464% (+0.1%) from 96.367%
TEST_CMD="coverage run -m unittest"

push

travis-ci-com

web-flow
Document git's ignore-revs-file feature (#1419)

* Document git's ignore-revs-file feature

A long-standing counterargument against moving to automated code formatters
like Black is that the migration will clutter up the output of git blame.
This used to be a valid argument, but not anymore. Since git version 2.23,
git natively supports ignoring revisions in blame with the --ignore-rev
and --ignore-revs-file options.

This isn't documented in the Black documentation. It should be as it would
put old projects wanting to migrate to Black at ease since blame won't
be ruined.

* Add links so people can +1 on --ignore-revs-file support

* Fix wording

'Counterargument' was the wrong word since it means an objection to an objection. 'Argument' is the proper word I was looking for.

Co-authored-by: Cooper Lees <me@cooperlees.com>

4229 of 4384 relevant lines covered (96.46%)

0.96 hits per line

Source Files on job 870.4 (TEST_CMD="coverage run -m unittest")
  • Tree
  • List 0
  • Changed 3
  • Source Changed 1
  • Coverage Changed 2
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Build 1154
  • Travis Job 870.4
  • 12e857f2 on github
  • Prev Job for TEST_CMD="coverage run -m unittest" on master (#864.3)
  • Next Job for TEST_CMD="coverage run -m unittest" on master (#1832.3)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc