2
100%
master: 100%

Ran 25 Apr 2015 05:11AM UTC

Files 63

Run time 9s

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 25 Apr 2015 05:06AM UTC coverage: 96.322% (+0.6%) from 95.743%

Job # 2.0

Build Type

push

travis-ci

Committed by

sds

Commit Message

Wrap Sexp atoms in Atom class

One of the issues we're already seeing is the need to explicitly check
whether a Sexp is an expression or an atom. Rather than have to do this
check every time, we create an `Atom` class which wraps the literal
value and defines `==` and `match?` methods so it acts like a Sexp where
it matters.

This allows us to simplify logic to not concern ourselves with whether
an object is an expression or an atom--the underlying helpers will do
the differentiation for us.

As part of this change, a number of other areas were changed so things
worked--delegating methods to the underlying value requires a slight
change in strategy when doing regex matches, for example.

We also add some tests for the `Sexp` class.

Run Details

1519 of 1577 relevant lines covered (96.32%)

24.24 hits per line

sds / slim-lint / 26 / 2
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 26.2 (2.0)

sds / slim-lint / 26 / 2 100% master: 100%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 26.2 (2.0)

sds / slim-lint / 26 / 2
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x