• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

abs-lang / abs / 867 / 2
72%
master: 63%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: 2.8.x
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 25 Aug 2019 05:16PM UTC
Files 7
Run time 1s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

25 Aug 2019 05:13PM UTC coverage: 71.357% (+1.3%) from 70.098%
867.2

Pull #276

travis-ci-com

web-flow
Negative indexes, closes #274

This PR adds support for negative indexes in arrays / strings.

``` bash
[1,2,3][-1] #3
```

There is one change that might alter existing ABS scripts, and that's
non-existing indexes, for strings, returning an empty string rather than
`null`.

I believe it's an ok thing to break as both will evaluate to `false`
when casted to boolean, and to check whether an index exists one can
simply:

* check the length of the string (`s.len()`)
* check the boolean value of the index (`!!s[idx]`)

both these examples do not break with these changes. I instead admit
that it would be weird to see code such as:

``` bash
if s[idx] == null {
  ...
}
```

rather than

```
if !s[idx] {
  ...
}
```

So I guess this is a change that can go through, as it really shouldn't
impact much of the userbase.
Pull Request #276: Negative indexes, closes #274

2708 of 3795 relevant lines covered (71.36%)

42.14 hits per line

Source Files on job 867.2
  • Tree
  • List 0
  • Changed 0
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 0
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Build 582
  • Travis Job 867.2
  • 9b2cda74 on github
  • Prev Job for on negative-indexes (#857.1)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc