1
92%
master: 92%

Ran 23 Aug 2019 04:59PM UTC

Files 40

Run time 6s

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 23 Aug 2019 04:55PM UTC coverage: 91.753%. Remained the same

Job # COMPILER=g++ C_COMPILER=gcc BUILD_TYPE=Coverage

Build Type

Pull #861

travis-ci

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

Perform IWYU on library sources

Was looking at time distribution clang spends on my projects
that builds benchmark in-tree, and to my surprise
benchmark_register.cc + benchmark.cc + benchmark_runner.cc +
statistics.cc + benchmark.h were near the top.

There are two (well three) solutions here - to include less
stuff in benchmark's sources, to further partition benchmark's
sources (and to not build it in-tree :S).

This performs the first solution, since it's most straight-forward
and least controversial. The diff looks scary, and indeed i will be
quite surprized if this doesn't break build on some platform.
But I don't foresee any way to avoid that risk.

Repeating the measurements show that this either helps
(- ~2s clang front-end time), or the initial measurement was noisy.

Pull Request Pull Request #861: Perform IWYU on library sources

Coverage Stats

1780 of 1940 relevant lines covered (91.75%)

5303821.21 hits per line

google / benchmark / 2204 / 1
92%
master: 92%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 2204.1 (COMPILER=g++ C_COMPILER=gcc BUILD_TYPE=Coverage)

google / benchmark / 2204 / 1 92% master: 92%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 2204.1 (COMPILER=g++ C_COMPILER=gcc BUILD_TYPE=Coverage)

google / benchmark / 2204 / 1
92%
master: 92%

README BADGES
x