• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

coryodaniel / k8s_client / 16 / 1
56%
master: 77%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: routes-callback
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 14 Jan 2019 05:53PM UTC
Files 7
Run time 3s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

14 Jan 2019 05:50PM UTC coverage: 46.471% (-1.8%) from 48.315%
16.1

push

travis-ci

coryodaniel
Partially implemented client w/o macros for routing.

This falls apart once you get to different scoping of resources.

It currently works, because the macro is agnostic about opts being
passed into the match. If it gets too much, interpolation doesnt find
anything to do with the param and moves on, if its missing params, it
returns an error with the param (at runtime) that it knows its missing.

In this approach, the route_map has the params built into the map, so
you have to know which params are required ahead of time.

This surfaces in `Client.create/1`. Since we are posting a resource body
the name of the resource is in the payload, so it infers that the name
(which is generally a part of the URL) should be as well. But since this
is a POST its on the collections URL, which doesnt have a name param.

*This needs to refactor routes_test to generate a test for each swagger
operation.*

79 of 170 relevant lines covered (46.47%)

46.14 hits per line

Source Files on job 16.1
  • Tree
  • List 0
  • Changed 4
  • Source Changed 4
  • Coverage Changed 4
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Build 11
  • Travis Job 16.1
  • aeca4b6d on github
  • Prev Job for on macro-free-routing (#15.1)
  • Next Job for on macro-free-routing (#18.1)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc