1
96%
master: 99%

Ran 15 Nov 2018 05:18PM UTC

Files 25

Run time 2s

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 15 Nov 2018 04:27PM UTC coverage: 96.294% (+0.1%) from 96.173%

Job # COVERALLS=true DB=mysql

Build Type

Pull #43

travis-ci

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

Much as I appreciated the baroque SQL query, it does make maintenace much harder. Since the API does all the grisly mapping between patches, we can rely on that, going through each alt_allele_group in turn and checking that all the genes/seq_regions of it's members are consistent. The SQL query also did not handle Y/PAR regions correctly; it's fine if there are patches on chrY, as long as they are not in the PAR region, but the datacheck was incorrectly reporting these as failures. I was going to suggest API methods to use as comments in the PR review, but by the time I'd worked out what to suggest, I'd basically re-written the datachecks...

Pull Request Pull Request #43: New test/alt allele

Run Details

1533 of 1592 relevant lines covered (96.29%)

17.56 hits per line

Ensembl / ensembl-datacheck / 190 / 1
96%
master: 99%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 190.1 (COVERALLS=true DB=mysql)

Ensembl / ensembl-datacheck / 190 / 1 96% master: 99%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 190.1 (COVERALLS=true DB=mysql)

Ensembl / ensembl-datacheck / 190 / 1
96%
master: 99%

README BADGES
x