• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

andreasronge / neo4j / 628 / 1
98%
master: 98%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: query_proxy_refactor
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran 20 Aug 2014 04:47AM UTC
Files 92
Run time 39s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

20 Aug 2014 04:44AM UTC coverage: 98.389% (+0.4%) from 98.002%
2.1.1, JRUBY_OPTS='-X+O -J-Djruby.launch.inproc=false'

push

travis-ci

andreasronge
Started changing association and query_proxy, support has_many #416

 The question is if we should try to use cypher or if we should use the Neo4j::Node.node/rel/nodes/rels methods. I think the latter is easier but will not be as efficient on the Neo4j Server because of the many request it requires.

 Or we use this solution http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/cypherdoc-linked-lists.html
 Can it be done without the root node so that we don't have to create it for empty lists.

4031 of 4097 relevant lines covered (98.39%)

51.45 hits per line

Source Files on job 628.1 (2.1.1, JRUBY_OPTS='-X+O -J-Djruby.launch.inproc=false')
  • Tree
  • List 0
  • Changed 0
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 0
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Build 628
  • Travis Job 628.1
  • 4dcf83ce on github
  • Prev Job for jruby-19mode, JRUBY_OPTS='-X+O -J-Djruby.launch.inproc=false' on list (#613.2)
  • Next Job for 2.1.1, JRUBY_OPTS='-X+O -J-Djruby.launch.inproc=false' on list (#635.1)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc