8
100%
master: 100%

Ran 02 Aug 2016 02:40PM UTC

Files 10

Run time 1s

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 02 Aug 2016 02:30PM UTC coverage: 100.0%. Remained the same

Job # TOX_ENV=coverage

Build Type

Pull #27

travis-ci

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

params: add option to specify param validation (refs #5)

Param validation is now handled by additional `validators` keyword
argument to `BaseParam` class. This is consistent with API of field
definitions so we favour the reuse of same validation functions.
This means that all existing validato function factories available
in `graceful.validators` module can be used with params too.
The fact that params have different source than fields (query
string instead of content-type serialized body) does not matter
at all because in both cases we work on deserialized/internal
values.

What is different is the way how validation is triggered. Field
validation is mostly managed by field definition class but param
validation is almost exclusively handled by
`BaseResource.require_params()` method.

Pull Request Pull Request #27: params: add option to specify param validation (refs #5)

Run Details

446 of 446 relevant lines covered (100.0%)

1.0 hits per line

swistakm / graceful / 51 / 8
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 51.8 (TOX_ENV=coverage)

swistakm / graceful / 51 / 8 100% master: 100%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Source Files on job 51.8 (TOX_ENV=coverage)

swistakm / graceful / 51 / 8
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x