• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

microsoft / teams-ai / 7619822317 / 1 – javascript
80%
main: 80%

Build:
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Ran 23 Jan 2024 01:44AM UTC
Files 62
Run time 4s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

23 Jan 2024 01:40AM UTC coverage: 68.06% (-0.04%) from 68.099%
javascript – 7619822317.1

push

github

web-flow
[JS] chore: file cleanup and unit tests (#1183)

## Linked issues

Fixes: #1163, closes #1181
related to: #239 #54 

## Details

- Fixes MemoryFork doc strings
- Fixes TurnState doc strings
- Adds missing docs to several classes/methods
  - Adaptive Cards
  - TurnState
  - OpenAIEmbeddings
  - Azure OpenAI Client
  - testing folder
  - Layout Engine
  - System Message
  - User Input Message 
  - User Message
  - Action Response Validator
  - Default Response Validator
  - JSON Response Validator
  - Response
  - Teams Chef Bot files
- Fix `api-extractor` script to generate an updated version of
`teams-ai.api.json` -- it was very out of date
- Fix `typedoc`script to work. I did not merge in generated docs though;
we have never used the docs site and I'm not convinced we need it. But
at least the script works for if we decide to keep it.
- Move `Test____.ts` files into `packages/src/internals/testing` --
these are mini-modules used exclusively for testing, and for better
findability I decided to move them.
- Updated eslintrc for Teams Chef Bot to allow `@remarks`
- dev packages:
  - remove typedoc (unused)
  - remove unused typedoc script

## Attestation Checklist

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project

- I have checked for/fixed spelling, linting, and other errors
- I have commented my code for clarity
- I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (we use
[TypeDoc](https://typedoc.org/) to document our code)
- My changes generate no new warnings
- I have added tests that validates my changes, and provides sufficient
test coverage. I have tested with:
  - Local testing
  - E2E testing in Teams
- New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

---------

Co-authored-by: Corina Gum <>

1074 of 1661 branches covered (0.0%)

Branch coverage included in aggregate %.

1890 of 2694 relevant lines covered (70.16%)

19.7 hits per line

Source Files on job javascript - 7619822317.1
  • Tree
  • List 62
  • Changed 13
  • Source Changed 13
  • Coverage Changed 9
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line Branch Hits Branch Misses
  • Back to Build 7619822317
  • 8b51dbb7 on github
  • Prev Job for on main (#7619801318.1)
  • Next Job for on main (#7646069382.1)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc