thomst
/
django-searchkit
97%
|
Repo Added
|
Build
63
Last
|
Files
19
|
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
|
LAST BUILD ON BRANCH main
coverage: 97.3% (-0.1%) from 97.396%
push
github
6 of 8 new or added lines in 3 files covered. (75.0%)
3 existing lines in 1 file now uncovered.1009 of 1037 relevant lines covered (97.3%)
6.81 hits per line
Relevant lines Covered
1037
RELEVANT LINES
1009
COVERED LINES
6.81
HITS PER LINE
Source Files on main
Recent builds
| Builds | Branch | Commit | Type | Ran | Committer | Via | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20784847645 | main | fixed applying without saving by using querydict instead of json | push |  thomst |
github |
97.3 |
|
| 20570945017 | main | support for django 6.0 | push | thomst |
github |
97.4 |
|
| 20557994192 | main | removed redundant test code | push | thomst |
github |
97.38 |
|
| 20557931567 | main | add tests for applying searches without saving them | push | thomst |
github |
97.1 |
|
| 20556625249 | main | added fixme | push | thomst |
github |
95.65 |
|
| 20555083338 | main | added comment and fixme | push | thomst |
github |
97.45 |
|
| 20522228719 | main | refactored the as_fieldset templatetag to keep the logic out of the templates | push | thomst |
github |
97.78 |
|
| 20520060066 | main | Always open the search rule fieldset if there are only one filter rule This is kind of a hack otherwise we have all fieldsets closed if we add a new filter via the admin filter add-filter-button. | push | thomst |
github |
97.75 |
|
| 20432905521 | main | v2.2.0 | push | thomst |
github |
97.75 |
|
| 20432704450 | main | group lookup choices by case-sensitivity | push | thomst |
github |
97.75 |
 |
Badge your Repo: django-searchkitWe detected this repo isn’t badged! Grab the embed code to the right, add it to your repo to show off your code coverage, and when the badge is live hit the refresh button to remove this message. |
|
Embed ▾
Refresh
README BADGES
|