n1tehawk / lua-minify
98%
nitehawk: 97%

LAST BUILD BRANCH: binary-or-and
DEFAULT BRANCH: nitehawk
Repo Added
Files 1
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH binary-or-and
branch: SELECT
CHANGE BRANCH
x

34

Pull #1

travis-ci

web-flow 
Support for binary AND and OR operators.
Pull Request #1: Support for binary AND and OR operators

1795 of 1841 relevant lines covered (97.5%)

31001.14 hits per line

Relevant lines Covered
1841 RELEVANT LINES 1795 COVERED LINES
31001.14 HITS PER LINE
Source Files on nitehawk
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line

Recent builds

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
34 binary-or-and Support for binary AND and OR operators. Pull #1 web-flow travis-ci pending completion  
33 nitehawk Fix a typo / logical error in StripAst() And add the corresponding test case. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
32 20180518_refactor Fix a typo / logical error in StripAst() And add the corresponding test case. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
31 20180518_refactor Refactor getopen() The commit changes the function not to touch `p` during character search. This way there's no need to restore the starting position in case of a mismatch. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
30 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
29 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
28 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
27 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
26 nitehawk Further improvements on coverage push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
25 nitehawk Further improvements on coverage push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
See All Builds (28)