n1tehawk / lua-minify
98%
nitehawk: 97%

LAST BUILD BRANCH: binary-or-and
DEFAULT BRANCH: nitehawk
Repo Added
Files 1
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH binary-or-and
branch: SELECT
CHANGE BRANCH
x

34

Pull #1

travis-ci

web-flow 
Support for binary AND and OR operators.
Pull Request #1: Support for binary AND and OR operators

1795 of 1841 relevant lines covered (97.5%)

31001.14 hits per line

Relevant lines Covered
1841 RELEVANT LINES 1795 COVERED LINES
31001.14 HITS PER LINE
Source Files on nitehawk
Detailed source file information is not available for this build.

Recent builds

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
34 binary-or-and Support for binary AND and OR operators. Pull #1 web-flow travis-ci pending completion  
33 nitehawk Fix a typo / logical error in StripAst() And add the corresponding test case. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
32 20180518_refactor Fix a typo / logical error in StripAst() And add the corresponding test case. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
31 20180518_refactor Refactor getopen() The commit changes the function not to touch `p` during character search. This way there's no need to restore the starting position in case of a mismatch. push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
30 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
29 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
28 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
27 nitehawk Change lookupify() to return a separate table Modifying the original table by assigning new values to it was a bit iffy (i.e. "undefined behavior", see the caveats on table traversal with "next" in the Lua documentation). Let's use a cleaner app... push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
26 nitehawk Further improvements on coverage push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
25 nitehawk Further improvements on coverage push n1tehawk travis-ci pending completion  
See All Builds (28)