moosetechnology / VerveineJ

53%

v3: 50%

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH strict_mod_should_not_generate_stub

branch: SELECT

CHANGE BRANCH

x

• No branch selected
• 126-no-reference-to-class
• 133-reference-from-static-access
• access-candidates
• add-default
• array
• capture-of-bug
• cleaning
• codex/primary/local-7
• codex/primary/local-8
• constructorlookup
• constructors
• creating_cassify_stub_mode
• dead-code
• end-visit-abstractType
• entity_typing_duplication
• enum_values_evolution
• exception-comments
• feat/record
• fix-parameters-typing
• fix/225
• fix/265-handle-MethodReference
• fix/267-class-comment-wrongly-assigned-to-constructor
• fix/AllJdkVersions
• fix/ParametricConstructorInvocation
• fix/issues-221-222
• fix_duplications_on_contructors
• fix_stub_duplication
• generic-array
• implicitVars
• initializers
• interfaces
• issue-111
• issue-247-parameterized-type-lookup-incompatible-entity
• issue-248-comment-visitor-leaves-annotation-members-on-context-stack
• issue-249-comment-visitor-field-initializer-lambda-locals
• issue/124
• issue/141
• issue/142
• issue/146
• issue/149
• issue/151
• issue/153
• issue/156
• new-generics-implementation
• no_initializer
• object
• object_inheritance
• primitive-type-as-type-argument
• some-bugs
• strict_mod_should_not_generate_stub
• strict_mode
• up-famejava-version
• v3
• v4
• v5

Build # 31698953913

Build Type

Pull #261

github

Committed by web-flow

Commit Message

Merge c087e9e12 into 7953741d5

Pull Request Pull Request #261: Strict mode should not generate spurious stubs

Coverage Stats

2047 of 4028 branches covered (50.82%)

Branch coverage included in aggregate %.

16 of 30 new or added lines in 5 files covered. (53.33%)

6 existing lines in 1 file now uncovered.

4530 of 8381 relevant lines covered (54.05%)

2.23 hits per line