• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

coveooss / terragrunt
59%
master: 60%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: v1.4.0
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Repo Added 26 Jun 2019 10:28PM UTC
Files 53
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH v1.4.0
branch: SELECT
CHANGE BRANCH
x
  • No branch selected
  • add-env_vars
  • block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.20.10
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.20.12
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.20.15
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.20.20
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.21.1
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.21.6
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.21.9
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.23.3
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.23.8
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.24.5
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-1.25.6
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/hashicorp/terraform-0.12.3
  • dependabot/go_modules/github.com/urfave/cli-1.22.1
  • dependabot/go_modules/gopkg.in/yaml.v2-2.2.4
  • feature/dt-1503-warning-on-invalid-config
  • features/stop-looking-after-match-in-import-variables
  • jg-old/fix-import-variables
  • master
  • move-gotemplate
  • v1.4.0

10 Oct 2019 11:24AM UTC coverage: 59.493% (+0.6%) from 58.868%
711

push

travis-ci

web-flow
Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file (#87)

* Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file

If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with the latest one. That works if blocks are defined in separated files. But it did not work properly when blocks were declared in the same file.

I fixed this in the generic merge function, but that only worked if multiple blocks were declared in an included file but not for the main configuration file. So, I forced the main file to also go through the merge process (starting with an empty structure).

I also discovered a test `no-tf-variable` that was working even if it used the same block many times in the configuration. Fixing this problem caused that specific test to fail.

To ensure that we don't break existing configuration without being noticed, I added a warning when a block is overridden by another block with the same name in a file.

* Changes following review comments

3588 of 6031 relevant lines covered (59.49%)

80.56 hits per line

Relevant lines Covered
Build:
Build:
6031 RELEVANT LINES 3588 COVERED LINES
80.56 HITS PER LINE
Source Files on master
  • List 0
  • Changed 34
  • Source Changed 14
  • Coverage Changed 34
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line

Recent builds

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
711 v1.4.0 Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file (#87) * Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with ... push 15 Oct 2019 02:13PM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.49
708 master Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file (#87) * Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with ... push 10 Oct 2019 11:29AM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.51
707 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Changes following review comments Pull #87 10 Oct 2019 02:28AM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.49
706 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Changes following review comments push 10 Oct 2019 02:27AM UTC jocgir travis-ci
59.51
704 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Changes following review comments push 10 Oct 2019 02:23AM UTC jocgir travis-ci
59.51
705 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Changes following review comments Pull #87 10 Oct 2019 02:23AM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.51
703 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with the latest one. That works if blocks are defined in separated files. But it... Pull #87 09 Oct 2019 09:11PM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.48
702 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with the latest one. That works if blocks are defined in separated files. But it... push 09 Oct 2019 09:10PM UTC jocgir travis-ci
59.5
701 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with the latest one. That works if blocks are defined in separated files. But it... Pull #87 09 Oct 2019 09:07PM UTC web-flow travis-ci
59.48
700 block-redefined-in-same-file-should-override Properly handle multiple blocks with same name in a single file If we declare a block with the same name, the normal behavior is to overwrite the previous definition with the latest one. That works if blocks are defined in separated files. But it... push 09 Oct 2019 09:07PM UTC jocgir travis-ci
59.48
See All Builds (66)
  • Repo on GitHub
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2025 Coveralls, Inc