• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In
Warning: This build has drifted.
The coverage report for this pull request build may be inaccurate because its base commit is no longer the HEAD of its target branch.
This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

    • Learn more: For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes for pull request builds.
    • Fix now: For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.
    • Prevent going forward: To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
New Repo Setting:
INCLUDE COVERAGE % WITH WARNINGS ABOUT DRIFTED BUILDS?

Enabling this setting will include a (potentially inaccurate) coverage % with warning messages in status updates for drifted builds.

Adjust setting

kubernetes-sigs / lws / 34344811312
63%
main: 64%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: dependabot/npm_and_yarn/site/postcss-cli-12.0.0
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Ran 11 Sep 2026 05:25PM UTC
Jobs 1
Files 29
Run time 1min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

09 Sep 2026 11:15AM UTC coverage: 63.339%. Remained the same
34344811312

Pull #1007

github

aliceco01
docs: correct autoscaling page details against the shipped manifests

Three statements on the page did not match the manifests it links to.

The intro described the HPA as scaling between minReplicas 2 and
maxReplicas 5. That is right for the vLLM and SGLang examples but not for
the nginx one, which allows up to 8, so the bounds are now described
without hardcoding one example's numbers.

The resource-requests section claimed every container sets both requests
and limits. SGLang sets a CPU request against a GPU limit and no memory
on either side, and vLLM sets memory only as a limit. What actually
matters for the HPA is that each container requests the metric its HPA
targets, which is what the text now says.

Cleanup deleted only lws-hpa. A reader who followed "Scaling on other
metrics" was told to delete that one first, so they are left with
lws-memory-hpa or lws-multi-metric-hpa still running and still scaling
the LeaderWorkerSet. It now deletes all three.

Signed-off-by: Alice C <83873276+aliceco01@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull Request #1007: docs: restore autoscaling coverage lost in the examples restructure

3134 of 4948 relevant lines covered (63.34%)

44.56 hits per line

Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 34344811312.1 11 Sep 2026 05:25PM UTC 29
63.34
GitHub Action Run
Source Files on build 34344811312
  • Tree
  • List 29
  • Changed 0
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 0
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Repo
  • Pull Request #1007
  • PR Base - main (#34220004709)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE TRIAL · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc