• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

ponder-lab / Hybridize-Functions-Refactoring / #2298
80%
main: 80%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-739-6721f597b1febe25181379bb3e6a99b1f85dd4e0
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Ran 03 Jul 2026 11:28AM UTC
Jobs 1
Files 32
Run time 1min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

03 Jul 2026 11:24AM UTC coverage: 79.286%. Remained the same
#2298

Pull #724

github

khatchad
Walk every node of a callee reference in the side-effect closure

`allCreationsWithinClosureInteral2` expanded each callee `MethodReference` through only the first of its call-graph nodes, assuming the calling context makes no difference. A shared synthetic summary breaks that assumption: `tensorflow.data.map` has one node per callback context, each with a different callee, so the walk descended into whichever callback the arbitrary first node carried. A creation on the unreached branch then failed the within-closure proof, and op-modeling allocations (result tensors/tuples, `read_data` stores) read as external writes—`HAS_PYTHON_SIDE_EFFECTS` misfired on pure-tensor code (`Streaming.call` and `FactorizedTopK.update_state` in deep_recommenders, both P1 on 0.52.13).

The walk now unions the successors of all of a reference's nodes. The closure stays reference-granular (and hence context-blind, as before); the union can over-widen through a shared summary's foreign contexts, which errs toward filtering—acceptable against a mod set that is itself context-sensitive.

`testPythonSideEffects68` pins the scenario: two nested callbacks piped through `dataset.map(...)`, the second performing the tensor work; red without the fix.

Closes #722.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S1U9TQRo3Wmhfu86DRcBNW
Pull Request #724: Walk every node of a callee reference in the side-effect closure

6 of 6 new or added lines in 1 file covered. (100.0%)

1665 of 2100 relevant lines covered (79.29%)

0.79 hits per line

Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 #2298.1 03 Jul 2026 11:28AM UTC 32
79.29
Source Files on build #2298
  • Tree
  • List 32
  • Changed 1
  • Source Changed 1
  • Coverage Changed 1
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Repo
  • Pull Request #724
  • PR Base - main (#)
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc