supabase / supabase / 25677100346

77%

push

github

fix(reports): replace explicit any with number in tickFormatter callbacks (#45794)

## Problem

Recent database report PRs introduced `(value: any)` type annotations in
recharts `tickFormatter` callbacks, pushing the
`@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any` ESLint ratchet from baseline 1014
to 1017 and blocking all PR merges.

## Fix

Replace `(value: any)` with `(value: number)` in all affected
`tickFormatter` callbacks across the three flagged files. Recharts
always passes a number to tick formatters, so this is a safe and
accurate type.

## How to test

- Run `pnpm lint --filter=studio` and confirm no new
`@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any` violations appear in the three
changed files
- Check the ESLint ratchet count is back at or below baseline 1014

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Refactor**
* Improved type safety for Y‑axis tick formatters across observability
charts (Memory, Swap, Network throughput, Disk IOPS/throughput/usage,
Replication Lag), ensuring tick values are treated as numeric for more
consistent chart rendering and reliability.

[![Review Change
Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/45794)
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Ali Waseem <waseema393@gmail.com>

938 of 1324 branches covered (70.85%)

Branch coverage included in aggregate %.

1442 of 1996 relevant lines covered (72.24%)

249.31 hits per line