1165
98%

Ran 25 Aug 2016 02:26AM UTC

Jobs 1

Files 138

Run time 14s

Badge

Embed ▾

pending completion

Build # 1165

Build Type

push

travis-ci

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

Advantage common convention for naming root types. (#470)

This is a result of a conversation I had with @lacker that we should provide a stronger opinion on what to name the root types, and then advantage that opinion. Here's the result of that:

If you use the type names `Query` and `Mutation` for your root types, then printing the schema or parsing a schema IDL can omit the `schema { query: Query, mutation: Mutation }` boilerplate. If your root type names are anything other than these, then you have to include it.

There doesn't seem to be a significant downsite to this except for the relative complication of understanding why sometimes a `schema {}` description is included and sometimes it isn't.

Run Details

7422 of 7555 relevant lines covered (98.24%)

1398.7 hits per line

Jobs

ID	Job ID	Ran	Files	Coverage
1	1165.1	25 Aug 2016 02:26AM UTC	0	98.24	Travis Job 1165.1

Source Files on build 1165

Detailed source file information is not available for this build.

graphql / graphql-js / 1165
98%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 1165

graphql / graphql-js / 1165 98%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 1165

graphql / graphql-js / 1165
98%

README BADGES
x