rust-bitcoin / rust-bitcoin / 12021272589
83%
master: 83%

LAST BUILD BRANCH: 0.32.7-arbitrary
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Ran
Jobs 1
Files 92
Run time 1min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst
coverage: 83.327% (-0.008%) from 83.335%
12021272589

push

github

apoelstra 
Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#3655: Manually backport 3640

<a class=hub.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://git"><a class=hub.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/commit/8d2267c24f68d3ee12d96a2e157df787ab79f39c">8d2267c24<a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/commit/699f5b987713a0a1c28d9a1799622c771c220091"> backport: address: Add `Address::into_unchecked` (Tobin C. Harding)
<a class="double-link" href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/commit/499dd80a0ffc8bc3e830a130b027f508f39a8858">499dd80a0</a> backport: address: Simplify `Address::assume_checked` impl (Tobin C. Harding)

Pull request description:

  Manually backport the 2 patches from #3640. I did not investigate why the patches didn't apply cleanly I just grabed the changes from each patch. I did keep the patches separate and retained the commit logs. Holla if there is a better way to do this since we are backporting often these days.

ACKs for top commit:
  MaxFangX:
    ACK [`8d2267c`](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3655/commits/8d2267c24f68d3ee12d96a2e157df787ab79f39c), confirmed use of `Address::into_unchecked` compiles and passes tests downstream with patch
  apoelstra:
    ACK 8d2267c24f68d3ee12d96a2e157df787ab79f39c; successfully ran local tests

Tree-SHA512: 92ae39092445302b4439b0908df8aa32dbb

1 of 2 new or added lines in 1 file covered. (50.0%)

18611 of 22335 relevant lines covered (83.33%)

17358.97 hits per line

Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 12021272589.1 0
83.33
 GitHub Action Run
Source Files on build 12021272589
Detailed source file information is not available for this build.