• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In
Warning: This build has drifted.
The coverage report for this pull request build may be inaccurate because its base commit is no longer the HEAD of its target branch.
This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

    • Learn more: For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes for pull request builds.
    • Fix now: For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.
    • Prevent going forward: To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
New Repo Setting:
INCLUDE COVERAGE % WITH WARNINGS ABOUT DRIFTED BUILDS?

Enabling this setting will include a (potentially inaccurate) coverage % with warning messages in status updates for drifted builds.

Adjust setting

lightninglabs / taproot-assets / 10406480087
40%
main: 57%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1913-46bebd3a34518c96f58957c2cb9c91e18cfdf1cf
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Ran 15 Aug 2024 03:47PM UTC
Jobs 1
Files 201
Run time 1min
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

15 Aug 2024 03:43PM UTC coverage: 40.177% (+0.01%) from 40.163%
10406480087

Pull #1089

github

guggero
scripts+tapdb: do sqlc required replacement in script

Our SQL scripts on disk were neither SQLite nor Postgres compatible, we
used a version suited for sqlc to generate the correct data types we
wanted, then did some type replacements in-memory when actually applying
the migration files.
This is somewhat dangerous as it will lead to situations where if a user
applies a migration file manually, they'll end up with table primary
keys that ARE NOT auto incrementing.

To fix this issue, we make sure that we always write fully SQLite
compatible SQL code and only apply fixes for the sqlc code generation
directly before generating the code.
Pull Request #1089: tapdb: fix multiple issues around migration file handling

23691 of 58967 relevant lines covered (40.18%)

54468.98 hits per line

Uncovered Existing Lines

Lines Coverage ∆ File
1
83.64
-0.26% commitment/tap.go
2
75.37
-1.49% tapdb/migrations.go
2
81.54
0.0% asset/asset.go
4
68.5
0.0% tapgarden/caretaker.go
10
51.12
0.9% universe/interface.go
Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 unit - 10406480087.1 15 Aug 2024 03:47PM UTC 201
40.18
GitHub Action Run
Source Files on build 10406480087
  • Tree
  • List 201
  • Changed 75
  • Source Changed 0
  • Coverage Changed 9
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line
  • Back to Repo
  • Pull Request #1089
  • PR Base - main (#10385622104)
  • Delete
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2025 Coveralls, Inc