9291178548
55%
main: 10%

Ran 29 May 2024 06:27PM UTC

Jobs 1

Files 38

Run time 1min

Badge

Embed ▾

Committed 29 May 2024 06:21PM UTC coverage: 55.5%. Remained the same

Build # 9291178548

Build Type

Pull #3030

github

Committed by

web-flow

Commit Message

Revise use of experimental folder and update OTG references

The experimental folder is over-used and contains many tests which in fact do pass one or more DUT's.  The previous practice encouraged use of the experimental folder by default, for example, if only a README was created, but without automation, it was unknown if the test could pass.

Instead the default should be to use the regular feature folder for new README documentation without test automation.  The experimental folder should only be used if the test automation is written and proven not to pass on any known DUT.  The intent is this is a small hint to people that the test automation is not proven to work and therefore suspect to changes.

The problem with this approach is we typically write a README before the automation is implemented.  Later when the automation is added, even if passing 1+ DUT, the folder is not  updated.

Pull Request Pull Request #3030: Revise use of experimental folder and update OTG references

Run Details

1983 of 3573 relevant lines covered (55.5%)

0.63 hits per line

Jobs

ID	Job ID	Ran	Files	Coverage
1	9291178548.1	29 May 2024 06:27PM UTC	38	55.5	GitHub Action Run

openconfig / featureprofiles / 9291178548
55%
main: 10%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 9291178548

openconfig / featureprofiles / 9291178548 55% main: 10%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 9291178548

openconfig / featureprofiles / 9291178548
55%
main: 10%

README BADGES
x