• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

c-ares / c-ares / #205
92%

Build:
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Ran 05 Nov 2023 03:52PM UTC
Jobs 1
Files 142
Run time 14s
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

05 Nov 2023 03:47PM UTC coverage: 82.697% (+0.01%) from 82.683%
#205

push

travis-ci

web-flow
`ares_channel` -> `ares_channel_t *`: don't bury the pointer (#595)

`ares_channel` is defined as `typedef struct ares_channeldata *ares_channel;`.  The problem with this, is it embeds the pointer into the typedef, which means an `ares_channel` can never be declared as `const` as if you write `const ares_channel channel`, that expands to `struct ares_channeldata * const ares_channel` and not `const struct ares_channeldata *channel`.

We will now typedef `ares_channel_t` as `typedef struct ares_channeldata ares_channel_t;`, so if you write `const ares_channel_t *channel`, it properly expands to `const struct ares_channeldata *channel`.

We are maintaining the old typedef for API compatibility with existing integrations, and due to typedef expansion this should not even cause any compiler warnings for existing code.  There are no ABI implications with this change.  I could be convinced to keep existing public functions as `ares_channel` if a sufficient argument exists, but internally we really need make this change for modern best practices.

This change will allow us to internally use `const ares_channel_t *` where appropriate.  Whether or not we decide to change any public interfaces to use `const` may require further discussion on if there might be ABI implications (I don't think so, but I'm also not 100% sure what a compiler internally does with `const` when emitting machine code ... I think more likely ABI implications would occur going the opposite direction).

FYI, This PR was done via a combination of sed and clang-format, the only manual code change was the addition of the new typedef, and a couple doc fixes :)

Fix By: Brad House (@bradh352)

88 of 89 new or added lines in 22 files covered. (98.88%)

6127 of 7409 relevant lines covered (82.7%)

2172.73 hits per line

Jobs
ID Job ID Ran Files Coverage
1 #205.1 05 Nov 2023 03:52PM UTC 0
82.7
Source Files on build #205
Detailed source file information is not available for this build.
  • Back to Repo
  • d2389cd3 on github
  • Prev Build on main
  • Next Build on main
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc