|
Ran
|
Jobs
1
|
Files
89
|
Run time
6s
|
Badge
README BADGES
|
push
github
Fix predict_next() in parser. Reported by Sergey Kaplun. (cherry-picked from commit caf7cbc57) Assume, we have the following Lua code: | local _ | for _ in (nil):foo() do end The first part of the bytecode emitted for it is the following: | 0001 KNIL 0 1 | 0002 MOV 2 1 | 0003 TGETS 1 1 0 ; "foo" | 0004 CALL 1 4 2 The `0001 KNIL` is a result of merging two `KPRI` instructions: one for the local variable, one for the slot with `nil` object. During parsing in `predict_next()` the second `MOV` bytecode is examined to set `pairs` or `next` local variable. But, as far as it moves `nil` value, that isn't an actual variable and has no the name, so this leads to the crash. This patch adds a check to be sure that `RD` (see <src/lj_bc.h>) in the `MOV` bytecode is an actual variable. Sergey Kaplun: * added the description and the test for the problem Part of tarantool/tarantool#8825 Reviewed-by: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> Signed-off-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> (cherry picked from commit 61ebb67b6)
5283 of 5944 branches covered (0.0%)
Branch coverage included in aggregate %.
20305 of 23191 relevant lines covered (87.56%)
682503.02 hits per line
| ID | Job ID | Ran | Files | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5999839960.1 | 0 |
87.83 |
GitHub Action Run |