35
100%
master: 100%

Ran 10 Nov 2013 06:43PM UTC

Jobs 4

Files 10

Run time –

Badge

Embed ▾

pending completion

Build # 35

Build Type

push

travis-ci

Committed by

eriknw

Commit Message

`get` is faster for list of indices with no default

PR #57 put an emphasis on the performance of `get` because it is
so frequently used.  Some timings for `get` were given in that thread.
This commit improves those benchmarks as follows:

"test list" is 50% faster (using a two-element list of indices).
"test long list" is 100% faster (using a 100-element list of indices).

This is achieved because `operator.itemgetter(*ind)(seq)` is significantly
faster than `tuple(seq[i] for i in ind)`.  For me, it is 3x faster.

Run Details

355 of 355 relevant lines covered (100.0%)

4.0 hits per line

Jobs

ID	Job ID	Ran	Coverage
1	35.1	10 Nov 2013 06:43PM UTC	100.0	Travis Job 35.1
2	35.2	10 Nov 2013 06:43PM UTC	100.0	Travis Job 35.2
3	35.3	10 Nov 2013 06:43PM UTC	100.0	Travis Job 35.3
4	35.4	10 Nov 2013 06:43PM UTC	100.0	Travis Job 35.4

Source Files on build 35

Detailed source file information is not available for this build.

eriknw / toolz / 35
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 35

eriknw / toolz / 35 100% master: 100%

README BADGES x

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

Jobs

Source Files on build 35

eriknw / toolz / 35
100%
master: 100%

README BADGES
x