Ran
|
Jobs
4
|
Files
3
|
Run time
24s
|
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
|
travis-ci
<a href="https://github.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/<a class=hub.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/778583afefa0e15efde354553288dd5688f84896">778583afe<a href="https://github.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/778583afefa0e15efde354553288dd5688f84896">">A top-level let is not a defun This thing-at-point call was introduced in </a><a class="double-link" href="https://github.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://github.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/3cd52f4993f73b53de8a4f380e2f5a7b75e40437">3cd52f499</a>">3cd52f499</a><a href="https://github.com/Wilfred/emacs-refactor/commit/778583afefa0e15efde354553288dd5688f84896">, but I'm unable to find a scenario where the third element in a sexp is indicative of a definition. I've added a test so if this has broken a feature, we can ensure that the use case here stays fixed. Fixes #31
88 of 193 relevant lines covered (45.6%)
11.6 hits per line
ID | Job ID | Ran | Files | Coverage | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 120.1 (EVM_EMACS=emacs-24.3-travis) | 3 |
45.6 |
Travis Job 120.1 | |
2 | 120.2 (EVM_EMACS=emacs-24.4-travis) | 3 |
45.31 |
Travis Job 120.2 | |
3 | 120.3 (EVM_EMACS=emacs-24.5-travis) | 3 |
45.31 |
Travis Job 120.3 | |
4 | 120.4 (EVM_EMACS=emacs-25.1-travis) | 3 |
45.31 |
Travis Job 120.4 |
Coverage | ∆ | File | Lines | Relevant | Covered | Missed | Hits/Line |
---|