whitequark / parser / 787

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
787 master + ruby23.y: implement optional superclass See upstream commit ruby/ruby@d311b7d (r51529). Pull #243 cremno travis-ci pending completion   set done
786 v2.3.0.0 Update changelog. push whitequark travis-ci pending completion   set done
785 master Update changelog. push whitequark travis-ci pending completion   set done
784 master Update changelog. push whitequark travis-ci pending completion   set done
783 master + parse.y: "<<~HEREDOC": implement dedenting heredocs (fixes #228). push whitequark travis-ci pending completion   set done
782 master Merge pull request #242 from alexdowad/simplify_some_more More tweaking on the lexer push whitequark travis-ci pending completion   set done
781 master Don't accept ?\u{1 2 3}, Ruby doesn't Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
780 master Don't accept ?\u{1 2 3}, Ruby doesn't Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
779 master Don't accept ?\u{1 2 3}, Ruby doesn't Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
778 master Don't accept ?\u{1 2 3}, Ruby doesn't Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
777 master Add some more tests for ?\u... syntax Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
776 master Use @have_encode instead of defined?(Encoding) (for consistency) Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
775 master ?\u{9} should not match error rule The rule which throws an error for invalid \u escapes would match \u{9}. This was never noticed, because rather than directly raising an error, it would assign a lambda to @escape, which would subsequently be ov... Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
774 master ?\u{9} should not match error rule Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done
773 master Avoid useless string copy if source is in UTF-32LE encoding `string.encode(string.encoding)` doesn't change a string's encoding, but it does copy the string. If our source code is already in UTF-32LE encoding, we don't want to copy it for nothing... Pull #242 alexdowad travis-ci pending completion   set done