• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

pions / rtp
69%
master: 79%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: optimize-next-nalu
DEFAULT BRANCH: master
Repo Added 28 Jan 2019 06:16AM UTC
Files 8
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH optimize-next-nalu
branch: optimize-next-nalu
CHANGE BRANCH
x
Reset
  • optimize-next-nalu
  • abs-send-time
  • fix/packet-crash
  • fuzzer
  • marshal-to
  • master
  • module
  • v1.0.0
  • v1.0.1
  • v1.0.2
  • v1.1.0

pending completion
97

push

travis-ci

kixelated
Optimize h.264 NAL splitting

It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got
carried away.

As compared to `emitNalu`:
```
name        old time/op  new time/op  delta
nextNALU-8  40.1ns ± 0%  22.6ns ± 1%  -43.48%
```

331 of 482 relevant lines covered (68.67%)

2.62 hits per line

Relevant lines Covered
Build:
Build:
482 RELEVANT LINES 331 COVERED LINES
2.62 HITS PER LINE
Source Files on optimize-next-nalu
Detailed source file information is not available for this build.

Recent builds

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
97 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` push 29 Mar 2019 09:10PM UTC kixelated travis-ci pending completion  
98 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` Pull #10 29 Mar 2019 09:09PM UTC web-flow travis-ci pending completion  
51 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` Pull #10 21 Feb 2019 10:39PM UTC web-flow travis-ci pending completion  
50 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` push 21 Feb 2019 10:39PM UTC kixelated travis-ci pending completion  
49 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` Pull #10 21 Feb 2019 10:36PM UTC web-flow travis-ci pending completion  
48 optimize-next-nalu Optimize h.264 NAL splitting It's not a bottleneck, I just thought there was a bug and then got carried away. As compared to `emitNalu`: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta nextNALU-8 40.1ns ± 0% 22.6ns ± 1% -43.48% ``` push 21 Feb 2019 10:27PM UTC kixelated travis-ci pending completion  
See All Builds (91)
  • Repo on GitHub
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2026 Coveralls, Inc