pfalcon / pycopy

0%

pfalcon: 97%

push

travis-ci

<a href="https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/<a class=hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://git"><a class=hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://git"><a class=hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://git"><a class=hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/<a class="double-link" href="https://git"><a class=hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f">4b149fb8a">&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/</a><a class="double-link" href="https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/&lt;a class=&quot;double-link&quot; href=&quot;https://git">&lt;a class=</a>hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/&lt;a class=&quot;double-link&quot; href=&quot;https://git">&lt;a class=</a>hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/&lt;a class=&quot;double-link&quot; href=&quot;https://git">&lt;a class=</a>hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f">4b149fb8a</a><a href="https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f">&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;double-link&quot; href=&quot;https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/&amp;lt;a class=&amp;quot;double-link&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;https://git&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;a class=&lt;/a&gt;hub.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f&quot;&gt;4b149fb8a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;https://github.com/pfalcon/pycopy/commit/4b149fb8a4fb18e954ba7113d1495ccf822e394f&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;&amp;amp;gt;py/objstringio: Add += operator for BytesIO/StringIO.

There&amp;amp;amp;#39;s a common anti-pattern of using a string as an accumulating string
buffer, e.g.:

buf = &amp;amp;amp;quot;&amp;amp;amp;quot;
while ...:
    buf += &amp;amp;amp;quot;something&amp;amp;amp;quot;
use(buf)

This is highly inefficient. The right pattern is to use StringIO, but
this requires rewriting code to use .write() method:

buf = StringIO()
while ...:
    buf.write(&amp;amp;amp;quot;something&amp;amp;amp;quot;)
use(buf.getvalue())

Instead, by introducing implementation of __iadd__ (+=) method, effectively
making it an alias for .write(), it allows for very clear and co... (continued)

0 of 0 relevant lines covered (NaN%)

0.0 hits per line