mapbox / mapnik-vector-tile

82%

master: 38%

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH joto-patch-1

branch: joto-patch-1

CHANGE BRANCH

x

Reset

• joto-patch-1
• avoid_clip
• clipper
• clockwise_fix
• correct
• coverage
• datasource-test
• debug_diff
• demult
• develop-master
• dont-track-empty
• enable-appveyor
• encode-benchmark
• expose-fill-order
• filter-during-decode
• fix-slow-raster-allocation
• fix-transform
• fix-windfail
• fix_decoder
• floor
• gcc5
• geometry-encode-bench
• geometry-tests
• include-clipper-in-coverage
• is-solid-pbf
• issue-132
• issue_122
• master
• multipoint-reserve
• netmapnik
• optimize-transform
• out-of-range-coord
• painted_fix
• pbf_datasource
• positive-orientation
• protozero-1.0
• protozero-v1.4.2
• recursive-benchmarking
• segfault-rollback
• sort_inner
• sse
• strategy
• update-deps
• upgrade-opt-in
• v0.10.0
• v0.11.0
• v0.12.0
• v0.12.1
• v0.13.0
• v0.14.0
• v0.14.1
• v0.14.2
• v0.14.3
• v0.14.4
• v0.8.0
• v0.8.1
• v0.8.3
• v0.8.4
• v0.8.5
• v0.9.0
• v0.9.2
• v0.9.3
• v1.0.0
• v1.0.1
• v1.0.2
• v1.0.3
• v1.0.4
• v1.0.6
• v1.1.0
• v1.1.1
• v1.1.2
• v1.2.0
• v1.2.1
• v1.2.2
• v2_perf
• v2_spec

Build # 607

Build Type

push

travis-ci

Committed by joto

Commit Message

Use next(tag) instead of next()

Or we have to call `skip()`. And the comment in line 428 is unclear. The `break` only exits the inner `while()`. Is that right?

Run Details

1557 of 1895 relevant lines covered (82.16%)

178.55 hits per line