• Home
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Announcements
  • Sign In

countvajhula / qi
95%
main: 95%

Build:
Build:
LAST BUILD BRANCH: HEAD
DEFAULT BRANCH: main
Repo Added 11 May 2021 12:46AM UTC
Files 12
Badge
Embed ▾
README BADGES
x

If you need to use a raster PNG badge, change the '.svg' to '.png' in the link

Markdown

Textile

RDoc

HTML

Rst

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH fine-tuning-feedback
branch: fine-tuning-feedback
CHANGE BRANCH
x
Reset
  • fine-tuning-feedback
  • 3.0-pre-release
  • HEAD
  • accurate-performance-baseline
  • add-backup-docs-workflow
  • add-bindings-to-qi
  • add-continuous-benchmarking
  • debug-pkg-build-error
  • dont-get-too-fancy
  • explicit-registration-for-foreign-macros
  • fanout-using-racket-expression
  • first-class-macro-extensibility
  • first-optimizations
  • groundwork-error-debugging
  • groundwork-for-binding-spec-and-compiler
  • groundwork-testing-3
  • incorporate-bindingspec-metadsl
  • legacy-maintenance
  • lets-write-a-qi-compiler
  • main
  • postlapsarian-require-latency-capture
  • prelapsarian-require-latency-capture
  • refactor-flow-to-delegate
  • remove-unused-sandbox-and-relation-dep
  • reorganize-package-as-lib-test-doc
  • reorganize-package-as-lib-test-doc-redux
  • revert-9-reorganize-package-as-lib-test-doc
  • small-core-language
  • track-require-latency
  • v1.0-maintenance

pending completion
#413

push

cover

countvajhula
Don't expect a "then" flow in the identifier form of `feedback`

1044 of 1102 relevant lines covered (94.74%)

0.95 hits per line

Relevant lines Covered
Build:
Build:
1102 RELEVANT LINES 1044 COVERED LINES
0.95 HITS PER LINE
Source Files on fine-tuning-feedback
  • Tree
  • List 8
  • Changed 1
  • Source Changed 1
  • Coverage Changed 1
Coverage ∆ File Lines Relevant Covered Missed Hits/Line

Recent builds

Builds Branch Commit Type Ran Committer Via Coverage
#413 fine-tuning-feedback Don't expect a "then" flow in the identifier form of `feedback` push 20 Jul 2022 04:36AM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#412 fine-tuning-feedback Change identifier-only behavior of `feedback` to "N" The "while" behavior can always be expressed using (feedback (while ...)) since the condition is a flow that has access to the dynamic as well as the static context, whereas the (feedback N) sy... push 20 Jul 2022 04:15AM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#409 fine-tuning-feedback add missing test push 20 Jul 2022 02:39AM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#407 fine-tuning-feedback streamline `feedback` implementations push 20 Jul 2022 12:44AM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#406 fine-tuning-feedback support `(feedback flo)` instead of `(feedback N)` push 15 Jul 2022 07:56PM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#403 fine-tuning-feedback support identifier form of `clos` push 15 Jul 2022 06:51PM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
#397 fine-tuning-feedback Support other variations in `feedback` syntax push 14 Jul 2022 04:53PM UTC countvajhula cover pending completion  
See All Builds (551)
  • Repo on GitHub
STATUS · Troubleshooting · Open an Issue · Sales · Support · CAREERS · ENTERPRISE · START FREE · SCHEDULE DEMO
ANNOUNCEMENTS · TWITTER · TOS & SLA · Supported CI Services · What's a CI service? · Automated Testing

© 2025 Coveralls, Inc