abs-lang / abs

71%

master: 72%

LAST BUILD ON BRANCH deprecate-legacy-command-syntax

branch: deprecate-legacy-command-syntax

CHANGE BRANCH

x

Reset

• deprecate-legacy-command-syntax
• badges
• 1.1.x
• make-hashes-iterable
• destructuring-hashes
• issue-144-cd-only
• key-in-hash
• sleep
• contributing
• release-1.1.0
• 1.1.0
• master
• 1.2.x
• issue-144-v2
• issue-166
• issue-164
• issue-164-v2
• parse-exponential-notation
• absrc-source-file
• background-commands
• issue-171
• issue-171-alex
• mount-abs-history-in-dev
• better-illegal-tokens-when-parsing-numbers
• number-math-rounding
• issue-190
• doc-command-executor
• add-code-of-conduct-1
• 1.2.0
• 1.3.x
• bats-testing
• go-1.12
• unicode
• issue-199-exec
• 1.3.0
• 1.4.x
• underscores-in-numeric-literals
• go-mod
• hash-str-should-convert-to-valid-json
• implicit-return-value
• fix-hash-to-json
• 1.3.1
• benchmark-for-lazy-evaluation
• lazy-evaluation-in-1.3.x
• 1.3.2
• repl-without-terminal-no-panic
• eval
• allow-digits-in-vars
• 1.4.0
• 1.5.x
• negate-in
• 1.4.1
• break-continue
• higher-file-writers
• stack-overflow
• unique
• 1.5.0
• numeric-bash-arguments-support
• 1.6.x
• 1.5.1
• index-ranges
• 1.6.0
• 1.7.x
• return-semicolon
• 1.6.1
• playground
• reverse-search
• echo-dying-message
• reverse-search-2
• replace-array
• replace-short-form
• number-abbr
• index-ranges-bug
• 1.6.2
• 1.7.0
• 1.8.x
• source-vs-require
• negative-indexes
• bash-style-interpolation-in-strings
• go-prompt-master
• array-tsv
• go-1.13
• abs-installer-fixes
• 1.8.0
• 1.9.x
• issue-284
• 1.8.1
• optional-chaining
• arg-panic
• 1.8.2
• 1.8.3
• 1.10.x
• 1.10.0
• 1.11.x

Build # 727

Build Type

Pull #254

travis-ci-com

Committed by web-flow

Commit Message

Deprecate / "unfavour" the legacy command syntax, closes #220

The `$()` syntax for commands is cool and works ok,
but presents issues with parsing and escaping. With
this PR this syntax has been removed from most of the
docs, replaced by the simpler backtick commands.

Since `$()` is still useful for embedding commands,
we kept a section of the docs dedicated to explaining
when you should use this vs backticks.

Pull Request Pull Request #254: Deprecate / "unfavour" the legacy command syntax, closes #220

Run Details

2580 of 3639 relevant lines covered (70.9%)

81.69 hits per line